Reviewer Guidelines

Article Substance Review
Your review will examine the material in accordance with the standard components of the article. If the content of the article deviates significantly, please write your comments.

Title
The title must describe the subject of the manuscript adequately, clearly, precisely and without multiple interpretations. If necessary, please suggest a title.

Abstract
The purpose of the study, the methods used, the results, and the main conclusions should all be briefly stated in the abstract. Please note that the abstract is the most read section of the paper.

Academic Anxiety
The author must describe the relative deprivation that has not or not received attention.

Reference Study
The authors are required to give credit to the contributions of others that are relevant to the article. Through gap analysis, the citation in the introduction needs to be able to demonstrate the author's innovation or novelty. They also shouldn't use too many citations.

Position of Author
The authors explain the academic position stated in the purpose of writing the article. The objective of the article review needs to be clearly clarified in order to answer the author's academic anxiety.

Method
The methods used to achieve the objectives must be detailed and precisely described to allow a competent reader to repeat the work of the author. The tools, materials, hardware/software platforms and frameworks used in the research also need to be explained.
Discussion and analysis
1. Clarity: the authors must write the information about method and research findings in simple, concise and effective way so that the readers are able to easily comprehend the article.
2. Organization of delivery: The research subject must be effectively and logistically described in the manuscript.
3. Duplication: Manuscripts do not repeat explanations of previous published works by authors or others. The authors should verify if manuscripts can be shortened without losing content by combining two or more tables and figures. Reviewers can provide some comments if there are duplications in the text.
4. Calculations: In some randomly selected cases, Reviewers examine if you can verify the calculations made by the authors.
5. Relation of Text to Tables and Figures: All tables and figures must be referred into the text/paragraph. The content of the table and figures must correspond with the statements in the text.
6. Titles of Tables and Figures: The content should be stated in the title. Please give suggestion to improve the quality of table/figure’s quality.
7. Title in Table/Caption: interpretation must be clear and use correct International System of Unit.
8. Graphics: Data for presenting graphs/pictures must be accurate.

Conclusion
To answer the hypothesis, a conclusion must be adequately and clearly stated and supported by data and testing.

Reference
All references in the manuscript must be in the Bibliography. There are at least 15 references, 50% of them are primary references (scientific journals, proceeding articles, reference books, dissertations) and were published within the last 5 (five) years.

Submitting Review Results
After you are willing to do a review, you can download the article files and additional files. You can fill out a review form or comment on your review or upload a file for editors and authors. You are expected to provide suggestions regarding the quality of the article. Reviews must be completed within 4 weeks. If you need more time, you can convey it to the reviewers (amaliyya@iainubangil.ac.id ).